Durvalumab with or Without Tremelimumab for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial (2024)

Abstract

Importance: New therapeutic options for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) are needed. This study evaluated dual checkpoint combination therapy in patients with mPDAC. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the anti-PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1) antibody using either durvalumab monotherapy or in combination with the anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 antibody using durvalumab plus tremelimumab therapy in patients with mPDAC. Design, Setting, and Participants: Part A of this multicenter, 2-part, phase 2 randomized clinical trial was a lead-in safety, open-label study with planned expansion to part B pending an efficacy signal from part A. Between November 26, 2015, and March 23, 2017, 65 patients with mPDAC who had previously received only 1 first-line fluorouracil-based or gemcitabine-based treatment were enrolled at 21 sites in 6 countries. Efficacy analysis included the intent-to-treat population; safety analysis included patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and for whom any postdose data were available. Interventions: Patients received durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks) plus tremelimumab (75 mg every 4 weeks) combination therapy for 4 cycles followed by durvalumab therapy (1500 mg every 4 weeks) or durvalumab monotherapy (1500 mg every 4 weeks) for up to 12 months or until the onset of progressive disease or unacceptable toxic effects. Main Outcomes and Measures: Safety and efficacy were measured by objective response rate, which was used to determine study expansion to part B. The threshold for expansion was an objective response rate of 10% for either treatment arm. Results: Among 65 randomized patients, 34 (52%) were men and median age was 61 (95% CI, 37-81) years. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 7 of 32 patients (22%) receiving combination therapy and in 2 of 32 patients (6%) receiving monotherapy; 1 patient randomized to the monotherapy arm did not receive treatment owing to worsened disease. Fatigue, diarrhea, and pruritus were the most common adverse events in both arms. Overall, 4 of 64 patients (6%) discontinued treatment owing to treatment-related adverse events. Objective response rate was 3.1% (95% CI, 0.08-16.22) for patients receiving combination therapy and 0% (95% CI, 0.00-10.58) for patients receiving monotherapy. Low patient numbers limited observation of the associations between treatment response and PD-L1 expression or microsatellite instability status. Conclusion and Relevance: Treatment was well tolerated, and the efficacy of durvalumab plus tremelimumab therapy and durvalumab monotherapy reflected a population of patients with mPDAC who had poor prognoses and rapidly progressing disease. Patients were not enrolled in part B because the threshold for efficacy was not met in part A.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1431-1438
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA Oncology
Volume5
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  • Durvalumab with or Without Tremelimumab for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial (1)

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Durvalumab with or Without Tremelimumab for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

  • APA
  • Author
  • BIBTEX
  • Harvard
  • Standard
  • RIS
  • Vancouver

O'Reilly, E. M., Oh, D. Y., Dhani, N., Renouf, D. J., Lee, M. A., Sun, W., Fisher, G., Hezel, A., Chang, S. C., Vlahovic, G., Takahashi, O., Yang, Y., Fitts, D., & Philip, P. A. (2019). Durvalumab with or Without Tremelimumab for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncology, 5(10), 1431-1438. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1588

O'Reilly, Eileen M. ; Oh, Do Youn ; Dhani, Neesha et al. / Durvalumab with or Without Tremelimumab for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma : A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. In: JAMA Oncology. 2019 ; Vol. 5, No. 10. pp. 1431-1438.

@article{2a0e431e0c434d6584bea3cb4cf0b525,

title = "Durvalumab with or Without Tremelimumab for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial",

abstract = "Importance: New therapeutic options for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) are needed. This study evaluated dual checkpoint combination therapy in patients with mPDAC. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the anti-PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1) antibody using either durvalumab monotherapy or in combination with the anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 antibody using durvalumab plus tremelimumab therapy in patients with mPDAC. Design, Setting, and Participants: Part A of this multicenter, 2-part, phase 2 randomized clinical trial was a lead-in safety, open-label study with planned expansion to part B pending an efficacy signal from part A. Between November 26, 2015, and March 23, 2017, 65 patients with mPDAC who had previously received only 1 first-line fluorouracil-based or gemcitabine-based treatment were enrolled at 21 sites in 6 countries. Efficacy analysis included the intent-to-treat population; safety analysis included patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and for whom any postdose data were available. Interventions: Patients received durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks) plus tremelimumab (75 mg every 4 weeks) combination therapy for 4 cycles followed by durvalumab therapy (1500 mg every 4 weeks) or durvalumab monotherapy (1500 mg every 4 weeks) for up to 12 months or until the onset of progressive disease or unacceptable toxic effects. Main Outcomes and Measures: Safety and efficacy were measured by objective response rate, which was used to determine study expansion to part B. The threshold for expansion was an objective response rate of 10% for either treatment arm. Results: Among 65 randomized patients, 34 (52%) were men and median age was 61 (95% CI, 37-81) years. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 7 of 32 patients (22%) receiving combination therapy and in 2 of 32 patients (6%) receiving monotherapy; 1 patient randomized to the monotherapy arm did not receive treatment owing to worsened disease. Fatigue, diarrhea, and pruritus were the most common adverse events in both arms. Overall, 4 of 64 patients (6%) discontinued treatment owing to treatment-related adverse events. Objective response rate was 3.1% (95% CI, 0.08-16.22) for patients receiving combination therapy and 0% (95% CI, 0.00-10.58) for patients receiving monotherapy. Low patient numbers limited observation of the associations between treatment response and PD-L1 expression or microsatellite instability status. Conclusion and Relevance: Treatment was well tolerated, and the efficacy of durvalumab plus tremelimumab therapy and durvalumab monotherapy reflected a population of patients with mPDAC who had poor prognoses and rapidly progressing disease. Patients were not enrolled in part B because the threshold for efficacy was not met in part A.",

author = "O'Reilly, {Eileen M.} and Oh, {Do Youn} and Neesha Dhani and Renouf, {Daniel J.} and Lee, {Myung Ah} and Weijing Sun and George Fisher and Aram Hezel and Chang, {Shao Chun} and Gordana Vlahovic and Osamu Takahashi and Yin Yang and David Fitts and Philip, {Philip Agop}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.",

year = "2019",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1588",

language = "English",

volume = "5",

pages = "1431--1438",

journal = "JAMA Oncology",

issn = "2374-2437",

publisher = "American Medical Association",

number = "10",

}

O'Reilly, EM, Oh, DY, Dhani, N, Renouf, DJ, Lee, MA, Sun, W, Fisher, G, Hezel, A, Chang, SC, Vlahovic, G, Takahashi, O, Yang, Y, Fitts, D & Philip, PA 2019, 'Durvalumab with or Without Tremelimumab for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial', JAMA Oncology, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 1431-1438. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1588

Durvalumab with or Without Tremelimumab for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. / O'Reilly, Eileen M.; Oh, Do Youn; Dhani, Neesha et al.
In: JAMA Oncology, Vol. 5, No. 10, 10.2019, p. 1431-1438.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Durvalumab with or Without Tremelimumab for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

T2 - A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial

AU - O'Reilly, Eileen M.

AU - Oh, Do Youn

AU - Dhani, Neesha

AU - Renouf, Daniel J.

AU - Lee, Myung Ah

AU - Sun, Weijing

AU - Fisher, George

AU - Hezel, Aram

AU - Chang, Shao Chun

AU - Vlahovic, Gordana

AU - Takahashi, Osamu

AU - Yang, Yin

AU - Fitts, David

AU - Philip, Philip Agop

N1 - Publisher Copyright:© 2019 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - Importance: New therapeutic options for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) are needed. This study evaluated dual checkpoint combination therapy in patients with mPDAC. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the anti-PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1) antibody using either durvalumab monotherapy or in combination with the anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 antibody using durvalumab plus tremelimumab therapy in patients with mPDAC. Design, Setting, and Participants: Part A of this multicenter, 2-part, phase 2 randomized clinical trial was a lead-in safety, open-label study with planned expansion to part B pending an efficacy signal from part A. Between November 26, 2015, and March 23, 2017, 65 patients with mPDAC who had previously received only 1 first-line fluorouracil-based or gemcitabine-based treatment were enrolled at 21 sites in 6 countries. Efficacy analysis included the intent-to-treat population; safety analysis included patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and for whom any postdose data were available. Interventions: Patients received durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks) plus tremelimumab (75 mg every 4 weeks) combination therapy for 4 cycles followed by durvalumab therapy (1500 mg every 4 weeks) or durvalumab monotherapy (1500 mg every 4 weeks) for up to 12 months or until the onset of progressive disease or unacceptable toxic effects. Main Outcomes and Measures: Safety and efficacy were measured by objective response rate, which was used to determine study expansion to part B. The threshold for expansion was an objective response rate of 10% for either treatment arm. Results: Among 65 randomized patients, 34 (52%) were men and median age was 61 (95% CI, 37-81) years. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 7 of 32 patients (22%) receiving combination therapy and in 2 of 32 patients (6%) receiving monotherapy; 1 patient randomized to the monotherapy arm did not receive treatment owing to worsened disease. Fatigue, diarrhea, and pruritus were the most common adverse events in both arms. Overall, 4 of 64 patients (6%) discontinued treatment owing to treatment-related adverse events. Objective response rate was 3.1% (95% CI, 0.08-16.22) for patients receiving combination therapy and 0% (95% CI, 0.00-10.58) for patients receiving monotherapy. Low patient numbers limited observation of the associations between treatment response and PD-L1 expression or microsatellite instability status. Conclusion and Relevance: Treatment was well tolerated, and the efficacy of durvalumab plus tremelimumab therapy and durvalumab monotherapy reflected a population of patients with mPDAC who had poor prognoses and rapidly progressing disease. Patients were not enrolled in part B because the threshold for efficacy was not met in part A.

AB - Importance: New therapeutic options for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) are needed. This study evaluated dual checkpoint combination therapy in patients with mPDAC. Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the anti-PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1) antibody using either durvalumab monotherapy or in combination with the anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 antibody using durvalumab plus tremelimumab therapy in patients with mPDAC. Design, Setting, and Participants: Part A of this multicenter, 2-part, phase 2 randomized clinical trial was a lead-in safety, open-label study with planned expansion to part B pending an efficacy signal from part A. Between November 26, 2015, and March 23, 2017, 65 patients with mPDAC who had previously received only 1 first-line fluorouracil-based or gemcitabine-based treatment were enrolled at 21 sites in 6 countries. Efficacy analysis included the intent-to-treat population; safety analysis included patients who received at least 1 dose of study treatment and for whom any postdose data were available. Interventions: Patients received durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks) plus tremelimumab (75 mg every 4 weeks) combination therapy for 4 cycles followed by durvalumab therapy (1500 mg every 4 weeks) or durvalumab monotherapy (1500 mg every 4 weeks) for up to 12 months or until the onset of progressive disease or unacceptable toxic effects. Main Outcomes and Measures: Safety and efficacy were measured by objective response rate, which was used to determine study expansion to part B. The threshold for expansion was an objective response rate of 10% for either treatment arm. Results: Among 65 randomized patients, 34 (52%) were men and median age was 61 (95% CI, 37-81) years. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 7 of 32 patients (22%) receiving combination therapy and in 2 of 32 patients (6%) receiving monotherapy; 1 patient randomized to the monotherapy arm did not receive treatment owing to worsened disease. Fatigue, diarrhea, and pruritus were the most common adverse events in both arms. Overall, 4 of 64 patients (6%) discontinued treatment owing to treatment-related adverse events. Objective response rate was 3.1% (95% CI, 0.08-16.22) for patients receiving combination therapy and 0% (95% CI, 0.00-10.58) for patients receiving monotherapy. Low patient numbers limited observation of the associations between treatment response and PD-L1 expression or microsatellite instability status. Conclusion and Relevance: Treatment was well tolerated, and the efficacy of durvalumab plus tremelimumab therapy and durvalumab monotherapy reflected a population of patients with mPDAC who had poor prognoses and rapidly progressing disease. Patients were not enrolled in part B because the threshold for efficacy was not met in part A.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069535178&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1588

DO - 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1588

M3 - Article

C2 - 31318392

AN - SCOPUS:85069535178

SN - 2374-2437

VL - 5

SP - 1431

EP - 1438

JO - JAMA Oncology

JF - JAMA Oncology

IS - 10

ER -

O'Reilly EM, Oh DY, Dhani N, Renouf DJ, Lee MA, Sun W et al. Durvalumab with or Without Tremelimumab for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncology. 2019 Oct;5(10):1431-1438. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1588

Durvalumab with or Without Tremelimumab for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial (2024)

FAQs

Durvalumab with or Without Tremelimumab for Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial? ›

Findings. In part A of this phase 2 randomized clinical trial of 65 patients, durvalumab plus tremelimumab therapy was tolerated in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and had an objective response rate of 3.1%, and no patients responded to durvalumab monotherapy.

Is durvalumab approved for tremelimumab? ›

On October 21, 2022, the FDA approved tremelimumab (Imjudo) in combination with durvalumab for adult patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

What is the best immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer? ›

There is also an FDA-approved immunotherapy drug, Keytruda®, for pancreatic cancer patients with certain genetic mutations. Keytruda may be an option for a small percentage of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Unresectable means the tumor cannot be surgically removed.

What is the chemotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? ›

Which chemo drugs are used for pancreatic cancer? In most cases (especially as adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment), chemo is most effective when 2 or more drugs are given together. For people who are not healthy enough for combined treatments, a single drug (usually gemcitabine, 5-FU, or capecitabine) can be used.

What is metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? ›

Metastatic Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) is a highly aggressive lethal form of pancreatic cancer that accounts for more than 90% of pancreatic cancer cases. It is the most prevalent type of pancreatic neoplasm.

What is the success rate of durvalumab? ›

Median OS was 47.5 months with durvalumab versus 29.1 months with placebo. The estimated 5-year OS rate was 42.9% with durvalumab versus 33.4% with placebo.

What is the new indication for durvalumab? ›

On June 14, 2024, the Food and Drug Administration approved durvalumab (Imfinzi, AstraZeneca UK Limited) with carboplatin plus pacl*taxel followed by single-agent durvalumab for adult patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer that is mismatch repair deficient (dMMR).

What is the new treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer? ›

On February 13, 2024, the Food and Drug Administration approved irinotecan liposome (Onivyde, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.) with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin, for the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. View full prescribing information for Onivyde.

Is chemo worth it for stage 4 pancreatic cancer? ›

Advanced (metastatic) pancreatic cancer is cancer that has spread from the pancreas to other parts of the body. Surgery to remove the cancer won't be possible. Chemotherapy may help to control the cancer and help with symptoms. It won't cure the cancer but it may help you live longer and generally feel better.

Does anyone survive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? ›

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal diseases, with an average 5-year survival rate of less than 10%.

What is the current treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? ›

Surgical resection is the mainstay of curative treatment and provides a survival benefit in patients with small, localized pancreatic tumors, but should be considered only alongside systemic therapy. Patients with unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent disease are unlikely to benefit from surgical resection.

How bad is pancreatic adenocarcinoma? ›

In general, the prognosis for pancreatic cancer is poor. The overall one- and five-year mortality rates are 24% and 6%, respectively. Approximately 80% of patients have regional spread or metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis.

What is the life expectancy of someone with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma? ›

Stage IV pancreatic cancer has a five-year survival rate of 1 percent. The average patient diagnosed with late-stage pancreatic cancer will live for about one year after diagnosis.

How aggressive is metastatic adenocarcinoma? ›

If the cancer has metastasized by the time of diagnosis, the 5-year survival rate is reduced to approximately 6.3%. In contrast, breast adenocarcinoma is generally less aggressive with a 5-year survival rate of 99.0%, if the cancer has not metastasized.

What is the marker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? ›

Though CA19-9 is the most familiar tumor marker associated with pancreatic cancer, there is ongoing interest in developing pancreatic cancer marker panels that include other proteins, glycoproteins, and microRNAs.

What is the brand name for durvalumab tremelimumab? ›

What is the most important information I should know about IMFINZI® (durvalumab) and IMJUDO® (tremelimumab-actl)? IMFINZI and IMJUDO are medicines that may treat certain cancers by working with your immune system.

What is the regimen for tremelimumab durvalumab? ›

The STRIDE regimen consists of tremelimumab at a flat dose of 300 mg given once on day 1, accompanied by the PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab at a 1500-mg flat dose given at the same time on day 1 and then continued once a month thereafter as long as the patient is benefiting and does not have prohibitive toxicity.

What is the mechanism of action of durvalumab and tremelimumab? ›

The rationale behind the use of durvalumab and tremelimumab combination is to enhance antitumor immune activity through two different mechanisms related to the inhibition of PD-L1/programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and CTLA-4 pathways: anti-PD-L1/anti-PD-1 operates in the tumor microenvironment and prevents T cell function ...

Is tremelimumab an immunotherapy? ›

Tremelimumab (tre” me lim' ue mab) is an IgG2 monoclonal antibody to the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) which is used in combination with durvalumab, a monoclonal antibody to the programmed cell death receptor ligand-1 (PD-L1), as immune therapy of HCC and NSCLC.

Top Articles
How to Create an Org Chart in Word: A Step-by-Step Guide - Support Your Tech
Video: Build an org chart using SmartArt Tools
Spasa Parish
Rentals for rent in Maastricht
159R Bus Schedule Pdf
Sallisaw Bin Store
Black Adam Showtimes Near Maya Cinemas Delano
Espn Transfer Portal Basketball
Pollen Levels Richmond
11 Best Sites Like The Chive For Funny Pictures and Memes
Things to do in Wichita Falls on weekends 12-15 September
Craigslist Pets Huntsville Alabama
Paulette Goddard | American Actress, Modern Times, Charlie Chaplin
Red Dead Redemption 2 Legendary Fish Locations Guide (“A Fisher of Fish”)
What's the Difference Between Halal and Haram Meat & Food?
R/Skinwalker
Rugged Gentleman Barber Shop Martinsburg Wv
Jennifer Lenzini Leaving Ktiv
Ems Isd Skyward Family Access
Elektrische Arbeit W (Kilowattstunden kWh Strompreis Berechnen Berechnung)
Omni Id Portal Waconia
Kellifans.com
Banned in NYC: Airbnb One Year Later
Four-Legged Friday: Meet Tuscaloosa's Adoptable All-Stars Cub & Pickle
Model Center Jasmin
Ice Dodo Unblocked 76
Is Slatt Offensive
Labcorp Locations Near Me
Storm Prediction Center Convective Outlook
Experience the Convenience of Po Box 790010 St Louis Mo
Fungal Symbiote Terraria
modelo julia - PLAYBOARD
Poker News Views Gossip
Abby's Caribbean Cafe
Joanna Gaines Reveals Who Bought the 'Fixer Upper' Lake House and Her Favorite Features of the Milestone Project
Tri-State Dog Racing Results
Navy Qrs Supervisor Answers
Trade Chart Dave Richard
Lincoln Financial Field Section 110
Free Stuff Craigslist Roanoke Va
Wi Dept Of Regulation & Licensing
Pick N Pull Near Me [Locator Map + Guide + FAQ]
Crystal Westbrooks Nipple
Ice Hockey Dboard
Über 60 Prozent Rabatt auf E-Bikes: Aldi reduziert sämtliche Pedelecs stark im Preis - nur noch für kurze Zeit
Wie blocke ich einen Bot aus Boardman/USA - sellerforum.de
Infinity Pool Showtimes Near Maya Cinemas Bakersfield
Dermpathdiagnostics Com Pay Invoice
How To Use Price Chopper Points At Quiktrip
Maria Butina Bikini
Busted Newspaper Zapata Tx
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Zonia Mosciski DO

Last Updated:

Views: 6066

Rating: 4 / 5 (51 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Zonia Mosciski DO

Birthday: 1996-05-16

Address: Suite 228 919 Deana Ford, Lake Meridithberg, NE 60017-4257

Phone: +2613987384138

Job: Chief Retail Officer

Hobby: Tai chi, Dowsing, Poi, Letterboxing, Watching movies, Video gaming, Singing

Introduction: My name is Zonia Mosciski DO, I am a enchanting, joyous, lovely, successful, hilarious, tender, outstanding person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.